UHCEF Article of Interest

=====================================================
Maggie Fox, Health and Science Correspondent
Reuters (click here for link to original article)
Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:19 PM ET

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States spends far more on health care than any other country but gets only mediocre care in return for its investment, according to a report released on Wednesday.

The U.S. national average score on 37 separate measures of health care falls far short when compared either to a few centers of excellence within the country, or to other countries, the report from the Commonwealth Fund found.

“Overall, you will see … that the United States scores poorly — an overall score of 66 (out of 100),” Cathy Schoen, senior vice president for research and evaluation at non-profit health-care research foundation, told a news conference.

“We have lives at stake both in terms of mortality statistics but also in terms of quality of life.”

The scorecard outlines overuse of expensive services, duplication of efforts, failure to coordinate and communicate and uneven quality of care, even within a single hospital.

Only a quarter of U.S. doctors have computerized their record-keeping or writing of prescriptions, with the rest relying on expensive, time-consuming and mistake-prone paperwork, compared to 80 percent in some other countries.

The non-profit fund, whose goal is to improve health care, measured 37 indicators ranging from newborn mortality to how much a hospital stay costs for someone with colon cancer.

Overall, the country scored 66 out of a possible 100 on a scale based on the best possible care available within the United States.

“We can do much better and we need to do much better,” said Dr. James Mongan, president of Partners HealthCare System in Boston, told the news conference, although he noted the country is home to some of the world’s highest quality healthcare.

FIRST ON COSTS

There is one area where the United States comes in first, compared to other countries. “We are by far and away the leader on costs,” Schoen said. Americans spend 16 percent of gross domestic product on health care — double the median for all industrialized countries.

But the United States scores 15th out of 19 developed nations on deaths from causes that are easily prevented if timely medical care is provided, such as heart attacks. France scores the best, with 75 deaths per 100,000, while the United States weighs in with 115 per 100,000. Only Ireland, Britain and Portugal score worse.

U.S. infant mortality is far higher than in any of the other 23 countries measured, with a rate of 7 deaths per 1,000 births. The next worst is New Zealand, with 5.6 per 1,000, while Iceland scores the best with 2.2 per 1,000.

Even adults with private health insurance or Medicare do not get life-saving and money-saving preventive care much of the time, the report found. “Barely half of adults (49 percent) received preventive and screening tests according to guidelines for their age and sex,” the report read.

If people do not want a more equitable health care system, they should care about saving money, the Fund experts said.

“If we closed just those gaps that are described in the Scorecard we could save at least $50 billion to $100 billion per year in health care spending and prevent 100,000 to 150,000 deaths,” the report reads.

“Moreover, the nation would gain from improved productivity.”
=====================================================
Universal Health Care Education Fund, 8 Beacon St, Ste 26, Boston, MA 02108-3722
uhcef@aol.com | 617-723-7001 | 800-383-1973 | fax 617-723-7002

This entry was posted on Saturday, September 23rd, 2006
and is filed under News Articles. Both comments and pings are currently closed. -->